Week
2 and another topic has fallen into my lap.
Can I be so lucky for the next fourteen weeks? Probably not, so let me take advantage of
this while I can.
Tuesday
I went to Eye Associates of Cayce for my yearly exam. After the doctor had completed her preliminary
examination, she assaulted my eyes with those drops to dilate them and announced
that in the meantime, I had to take the test to identify those faint dancing
squiggly lines on a screen. Certainly, the
early stages of pupil dilation could only add to the ease of the task.
An
assistant, Bart, came in to lead me across the hall for this test, and he
complimented me on how nice I looked (in my new vest and tie), commenting that
so many people these days appear in public in pajama bottoms. I told him I’d seen kids trying to do that at
school. The inevitable questions
followed, and he divulged he had a degree in English (but could never teach). After a proper amount of time discussing the
horrible state of people’s grammar these days, particularly on social media, he
began quizzing me on teaching journalism.
As
our poor-grammar-on-social-media discussion turned into a journalism discussion,
Bart revealed his mistrust of many of the “news” items people post online,
and how he always takes the time to check out such postings before he believes
them.
By
this time, he had escorted me back to the examination room, where I gestured to
the notebook of readings for this class I’d brought with me to kill time in the
waiting room. Or it may have been the
doctor’s charts—at this point my vision was getting fuzzier by the minute. But I could clearly see Bart for who he
really was. A literate consumer of news—right
here in South Carolina! I should have
placed him in a jar with holes punched in the lid.
I
told him I was currently taking a journalism class, and this exact topic was up
for discussion. News literacy. Healthy skepticism. The spread of news on social media. Verification.
Bart
mentioned when he wanted serious news and perspective, he looked to a variety
of trustworthy sources—aside from WIS (the local NBC affiliate) and The State (Columbia’s newspaper), both of which so many around here rely on—including
the BBC and Al Jazeera. Indicating my
notebook (or that stack of charts) again, I told him about the piece we had to
read about the American Time magazine
covers as opposed to the international covers, and that launched us into a
discussion American news tastes and the perception of Americans by others.
I
then admitted to Bart I was a bit skeptical of the citizen journalist
concept—and he agreed! I told him about
the idea of Open Journalism we’d just read about in The Elements of Journalism: the professional journalist sourcing eyewitness
accounts from social media and combining them with his or her expertly gathered
background information to bring the news consumer the best of the old and the
new—and a more complete story along with it.
Perhaps this is the best answer…it’s certainly an answer I can grow
comfortable with. Better than just
swallowing social media news wholesale, Open Journalism allows news to be filtered
through the trained eye of the professional journalist who can use his or her
lens to verify and help the reader or viewer make sense of everything.
I can get you a copy of Elements of Journalism to share, too. Maybe good to bounce ideas off, too
ReplyDeleteI think you've stumbled upon a rare find in Bart. Are you sure the eyedrops didn't cause hallucinations?
ReplyDeleteYesterday, CBS News tweeted that the Colts (my team) had signed a CFL star (the son of Cris Carter). I didn't believe it because of the article we read about several sources tweeting Joe Paterno's death before it actually happened.
We're in an exciting time where journalism is changing. I hope people will start to recognize the importance of verifying information, rather than swallowing it whole. IT all starts with us and our students.